No. 23-7560
David Darnell Whitehead v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alien-smuggling border-crossing criminal-intent criminal-procedure designated-port-of-entry illegal-immigration immigration-law mens-rea port-of-entry statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's conduct constituted bringing aliens to or entering the United States at a place other than a designated port of entry, and whether there was sufficient evidence that the petitioner knew of this fact
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. IN AN ILLEGAL ALIEN SMUGGLING CASE, WHAT CONSTITUTES BRINGING TO OR ENTERING THE UNITED STATES “AT A PLACE OTHER THAN A DESIGNATED PORT OF ENTRY”, AND WHETHER | THERE WAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT THE PETITIONER KNEW THAT THE ALIENS WERE BROUGHT TO OR ENTERED THE UNITED STATES AT A PLACE OTHER THAN A DESIGNATED PORT OF ENTRY. | | | | | | ii
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-21
Attorneys
David Darnell Whitehead
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent