Whether the Appellate Court erred in denying Hype's petition for a writ of certiorari

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | ) PHERER my First ipperd wes pre Dentieg fo acing Hype to TRH Pw arpaecnte banca? jiniae this Appellate Ploerey Neve PRIEESD the meet Eqregicus Connyct Ba PRMECHERS; withholding exculpatory Rubens bHEOF PAeupiced Hype 1 gesting Ga Tralee (Remco? ‘ NgaTea ; x Fx D Disnie Cis Cafe) X Extulpmiey Ev) Dene C3 OID, (yest < a yeiprems Coust Neve tye” stings Pre ShppA? Hine Seat IN PRO pepe C3 Copies) No Arrooert 48) phypebiontle Defense ions COMED on’ Sib, pansetstory NBER Peovide The Builet ther tyne wars SHeT WOT c ys’ Disraisece the expect wi would Teshs-[iSHT) ae AWRY LuTThhald the Dit Bullet [peg ispenonss rebate C (Ghrjmenomat CancReontrefion cdiusstc) bensecutees “PT: efSundy 2) ort) Ute THYDE fates mone ‘trad [phere Cri) Oh ) "Foaced Prppedlirte: Aahrnes, £ [d UBnon, Die aor ER)