Does the admission of false evidence constitute Giglio/Brady violations under Due Process Clause

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the admission of falsé evidence in substitute for the true and correct evidence, which itself was not originally stated to, by sworn deposition, constitute the Cause and Prejudice Doctrine bringing Giglio/Brady violations under Due Process Clause U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5, 14? 2. Did A.E.D.P.A. legislation create an air of unbalance in the judicial system for Petitioner who seeks Habeas Corpus relief, while actively exhausting all State remedies for Federal Review of petition under Section 2254(d)(1), the two separate bases for review of State Court decisions: the “Contrary To” clause and the “Unreasonable Application” clause, violations of U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5, 14? 3. Does the evidence suppressed by the prosecutor for regulating “prejudice” for purposes of “Procedural Default” Doctrine and materiality under the “Brady” Doctrine, violate Petitioner's Due’ Process Clause and: United States Constitutional rights under U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5, 14? \ Ya