No. 23-7564

Ricky T. Jackson v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confidential-informant criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-hearsay due-process evidentiary-sufficiency sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit's determination that uncorroborated and unreliable double hearsay statements of an unreliable confidential informant was sufficient evidence to support sentencing enhancements

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Honorable Court should grant certiorari to review whether the Sixth Circuit’s determination that the uncorroborated and unreliable doubled hearsay statements of an unreliable confidential informant was sufficient evidence to support two sentencing enhancements which double Mr. Jackson’s sentencing range. i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2024)

Attorneys

Ricky Jackson
Stephenie Nichole LapeStephenie N. Lape, PLLC, Petitioner
Stephenie Nichole LapeStephenie N. Lape, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent