No. 23-7564
Ricky T. Jackson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confidential-informant criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-hearsay due-process evidentiary-sufficiency sentencing sentencing-enhancement sixth-amendment sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit's determination that uncorroborated and unreliable double hearsay statements of an unreliable confidential informant was sufficient evidence to support sentencing enhancements
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether this Honorable Court should grant certiorari to review whether the Sixth Circuit’s determination that the uncorroborated and unreliable doubled hearsay statements of an unreliable confidential informant was sufficient evidence to support two sentencing enhancements which double Mr. Jackson’s sentencing range. i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2024)
Attorneys
Ricky Jackson
Stephenie Nichole Lape — Stephenie N. Lape, PLLC, Petitioner
Stephenie Nichole Lape — Stephenie N. Lape, PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent