No. 23-7568
Malek Lassiter v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c appellate-review court-of-appeals criminal-conviction criminal-procedure federal-statute section-924c sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court united-states-v-taylor
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether The Court Of Appeals Erred By Holding Lassiter's Convictions Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) On Counts 25 And 28 Remain Lawful After United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether The Court Of Appeals Erred By Holding Lassiter's Convictions Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) On Counts 25 And 28 Remain Lawful After United States v. Taylor, 142 8. Ct. 2015 (2022)?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-05-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2024)
Attorneys
Malek Lassiter
Paul Graham Beers — Glenn, Feldmann, Darby & Goodlatte, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent