Quentin M. Salmond v. Pennsylvania
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Is Conspiracy to Commit Third Degree Murder a Non-Cognizable Offense?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is Conspiracy to Commit Third Degree Murder a Non-Cognizable Offense? _ 2. Can a defendnat be convicted of Conspiracy to commit third degree murder and third degree murder, if he is not the shooter of a victim? 3. Is it Unconstitutional in Pennsylvania, to be senteced to consecutive terms, for a conspiracy and a Third degree murder that stems from the same episode and/or event? — 4, Does a Court violate a petitioner's Constitutional right to Due Process, if it denies a BRADY and/or NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE claim, ) before compelling the commonwealth to provide and/or produce the _ withheld material, when the petitioner has proven that the exculpatory material exist and is in the prosecution's possession? 5. Is it unconstitutional, for the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, to make the rulings in Commonwealth v. Bradley, 261 A.3d; 2021, non ; retroactive? 6. Does the Pennsylvania PCRA one-year time bar violate a petitioner's . Constitutional Rights, when he is a prisoner and a Jayman to the laws?