No. 23-7600
Keith Anthony Rosario v. Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process minimum-sentence north-carolina-v-pearce pearce-presumption presumption-of-vindictiveness resentencing sentencing-vindictiveness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether increases in minimum sentences upon resentencing, when no new objective information since the previous sentencing exists to justify the increases, violates the presumption of vindictiveness of North Carolina v. Pearce and the right to due process under the United States Constitution Amendment XIV?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether increases in minimum sentences upon resentencing, when no new objective information since the previous sentencing exists to justify the increases, violates the presumption of vindictiveness of North Carolina v. Pearce and the right to due process under the United States Constitution Amendment XIV?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2024-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2024)
Attorneys
Keith Anthony Rosario
John E. Egers Jr. — Peacock Keller, LLP, Petitioner
John E. Egers Jr. — Peacock Keller, LLP, Petitioner
Pennsylvania