Whether the court committed fraud on the court when it changed the trial transcripts of the petitioner's case without notice to counsel and the petitioner

No question identified. : QUESTIOW PRESEOTED 1 ee The brid’ Court Lomenitted FRRUD On) THE COURT 4 when The Cour f Change the Priel transeriptS of phe porobsen oO . Ce ’ tye li hedrad 46 Caonsel Len fekourecf and, jeen rashes Aes 2 Transaripks ouf fo cach Courtand the pebtoner Thus: Violet Ae pebtronere: Sif finendnes de (PORES fight fo GCavnse lof’ cAalce Shen fetsinecf> ae o7epiny fhe pebbiener frown Shower Vm Ae. fraud, hourl fail, -P heorl Bies anel fhe SYf CLAN Ce of Zinpropreity Za pe n0fson To witkdrecs as covasel ancl Threesh-ooF He proceeding Thos ; also Vielatans fe pehtroners Four fees th Aoriancfrer?dhe POS Right ot Moe Consh tebren fo 4 Par trad proceediay uffer STOP he petdrener frorr She tres Ars feasts for wanhrag a Mer hilfernay. y ot Altectecl We Fromenork” of the pebitionec’s dee prmess Ap of