No. 23-7604

Sheila Halousek v. Verizon

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal-denial arbitrary-dismissal civil-rights court-of-appeals district-court first-amendment judicial-discretion petition-clause petition-government redress-grievances
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Petitioner denied her explicit constitutional civil right under the First Amendment to petition the government for a redress of grievances when the Court of Appeals and the District Court arbitrarily and capriciously dismissed her case and denied her appeal?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED for REVIEW Was Petitioner denied her explicit constitutional civil right under the First Amendment to petition the government for a redress of grievances when the Court of Appeals and the District Court arbitrarily and capriciously dismissed her case and denied her appeal? Under California Consumers Legal Remedies Act California Civil Code §§ 1750 et seq and 15 U.S. Code § 45 Unfair Methods of Competition, (a)(1) “Unfair methods of competition in or affecting commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, are hereby declared unlawful,” must courts must uphold and enforce these laws or is this optional? Under 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law — are judges included within the scope of this law? ii

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2024)

Attorneys

Sheila Halousek
Sheila Halousek — Petitioner
Sheila Halousek — Petitioner