No. 23-7606
Tommy Tate Collins v. United States
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court fair-and-just-standard government-breach judicial-discretion plea-agreement remedy santobello-v-new-york sentencing-remedy
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the appropriate test or what factors should a district court consider when determining the appropriate remedy, after an appellate court has found that the Government breached the terms of the defendant's plea agreement and vacated the judgment pursuant to Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. What is the appropriate test or what factors should a district court consider when determining the appropriate remedy, after an appellate court has found that the Government breached the terms of the defendant’s plea agreement and vacated the judgment pursuant to Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971).
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-23
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2024-08-23
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-07-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 23, 2024.
2024-07-23
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2024 to August 23, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 31, 2024.
2024-06-27
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-06-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2024 to July 31, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2024)
Attorneys
Tommy Collins
Nicholas Sarcone — Babich Sarcone, PLLC, Petitioner
Nicholas Sarcone — Babich Sarcone, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent