No. 23-7613

Tre' Anthony James v. Louisiana

Lower Court: Louisiana
Docketed: 2024-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review due-process factual-sufficiency jackson-standard jackson-v-virginia law-of-the-case legal-sufficiency new-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is an appellate court's reversal of a trial court's grant of a new trial reviewable?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Ia it reversible error when an appellate court overturns a trial court’s grant of a new trial when, first, the decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial is not reviewable; and second, the trial court’s grant concerns factual sufficiency, . . which is not to be confused with legal sufficiency and the due process standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L-Ed.2d 560 (1979)? 2. Does the law-of-the-case doctrine prevent a high court from considering the correctness of an appellate courts decision? ; ii

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Tre' James
Tre' Anthony James — Petitioner
Tre' Anthony James — Petitioner