Question not identified.

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is the Statute of Limitations tolled for being considered under the age of 18 or of unsound mind, because of fraud; relevant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Hardin v. Straub? 2. Does Rule 60(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow for a new trial for a judges mistake/error of law, that deprives the 6" amendment right to a fair trial; relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Kemp v. United States? 3. Does the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment require local governments or states to compensate for personal/estate damages by taking property or deprivation of right to property; relevant to the 2"4, 5", 6, 8, & 14 amendments, and the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania & First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County? 4. Is Sovereign Immunity abrogated for discrimination under the Fair Housing Act/religious discrimination clause; or if 14" amendment due process and equal protection clauses have been deprived; relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick vs. Bitzer, or if the rights secured by the and, qth 5th . 6", 8, and 14° amendments and Castle Law have been deprived? 5. Is Judicial Immunity absolute 1 ‘ousing discrimination, religious discrimination or fraud upon court has occurred for lawsuits filed in individual or official capacity; if 14'" amendment due process and equal protection clauses have been violated relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick vs. Bitzer? 6. Is Prosecutorial immunity absolute if housing discrimination, religious discrimination or fraud upon court has occurred for lawsuits filed in individual or official capacity; if the 14 amendment due process and equal protection clauses have been violated . relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick vs. Bitzer?