No. 23-7623

Estephen Castellon v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2024-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence-preservation exculpatory-evidence law-enforcement sixth-amendment speedy-trial warrant-execution
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the failure to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence under the Trombetta and Youngblood standards, coupled with delays in trial proceedings, constitutes a violation of the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented Whether the failure to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence under the Trombetta and Youngblood standards, coupled with delays in trial proceedings, constitutes a violation of the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial? Whether law enforcement's application of Crim.R. 45 to extend the time limit for executing a warrant, in contravention of Crim.R. 41, constitutes a circumvention of a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial, thus warranting review by this Court? i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-01
Brief of Ohio in opposition submitted.
2024-07-01
Brief of respondent Ohio in opposition filed.
2024-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Estephen Castellon
Estephen Castellon — Petitioner
Estephen Castellon — Petitioner
Ohio
Anthony Thomas MirandaThe Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent
Anthony Thomas MirandaThe Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent