No. 23-7627
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights collective-defense constitution due-process free-speech international-organization military-alliance monarchy nato sovereign standing treaty
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure Punishment Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment DueProcess FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure Punishment Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a monarch can be removed from the US Constitution due to an individual 'discreating' on the monarch's image
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. In Case No. PD-0228-14, Texas v. Johnson, Can a Monarch be Removed from the US Constitution due to an individual ‘Discreating’ on
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. The Chief Justice and Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent