No. 23-763

JDH Pacific, Inc. v. Precision-Hayes International, Inc.

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2024-01-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration arbitration-standard clear-and-unmistakable-evidence evidence-standard first-options-precedent first-options-v-kaplan judicial-interpretation post-termination post-termination-claims state-supreme-court supreme-court-review united-states-supreme-court
Key Terms:
Arbitration Trademark LaborRelations
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state supreme court can disregard the 'clear and unmistakable evidence' standard established by the United States Supreme Court in First Options v. Kaplan and confirm an arbitration award that included claims arising post-termination of the agreement?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a state supreme court can disregard the “clear and unmistakable evidence” standard established by the United States Supreme Court in First Options v. Kaplan and confirm an arbitration award that included claims arising post-termination of the agreement? (i)

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent Precision-Hayes International, Inc. to respond filed.
2024-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 16, 2024)
2023-11-09
Application (23A413) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 15, 2024.
2023-10-30
Application (23A413) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 16, 2023 to January 15, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

JDH Pacific, Inc.
Malcolm Edwin WhittakerWhittaker Law Firm, Petitioner
Precision-Hayes International, Inc.
Marcy Hogan GreerAlexander Dubose & Jefferson LLP, Respondent