Deanne R. Upson Giese v. William Earl Wallace, III
DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Have the states of Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia violated the rights of this Mother and Child under the United States Constitution?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question 1: Given that the Equal Rights Amendment is now Ratified, have the states of Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia violated the rights of this Mother and Child under the United States Constitution? Question 2: Did the Maryland Supreme Court err in ruling that this case (and related 20 case history) has “no public interest”? : , Questions incorporated by reference from the Petitioner’s first case at the US Supreme Court: 1) Does it violate United States Constitutional Rights between parents and children (and vice versa), due process, equal protection, and free speech for the states courts to allow a complete severing of ties between this fit parent and her child for over 4 years — or any length of time — pendente lite or in final ruling that is too long to maintain contact and a continuing meaningful relationship, to protect the best interests of the : child, and ensure due process? 2) Does it violate the United States Constitution for the District of Columbia (DC) courts to informally allow matters relating to child custody and domestic violence to be heard in other state courts despite that child support and child custody jurisdiction properly attached in DC and no formal leave of court has been ordered to move matters to other states? 3) Does the US Supreme Court have a duty to impress the US Constitutional protections over interstate relations and civil rights to enforce the US Constitution in child support, child custody, and domestic violence cases to prevent interstate discrimination and litigant forum shopping between the states?