Whether the standards used by the Ninth Circuit in the Brouwer v. Raffensperger case violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , ) Dees a Sihear oF Me gor ALON [nodiy Ulan rninny WEA Sdandords Yessy Weewdia5 whey OF WN B® MRBWNVAYY — prewnge Vase iw Ye WAST Chasse 2, A) Shan Stade lao dys oF QWIde Gaicks Fanbod'S 8 Raslete We eran ck Yr Shade, OER Laait\ dos HE en Rennk any WWoroeg, WA TOY) Yaciiranhoy, AWKEMYTT © ZB Seen & Wee OF WaT Goody wisely LessiteS w Wdandat a “ Sra Naw aatQlaradk 5 doe Weanberds We eros Sars yo\hed? \\ “VU a ke, Wome o ARIE AS 3 Wrote can anak Bhs be WR Ly OmBGkug A Laue Haass 8) \S \ Jaskoe wes Rye WMS ok a Date Doloe as Ag LSXavG, TS Xy, WAS wohodta \we wn NN URIS by AS qroitions ! | &) Xs 9 cdnind Lebanon adds Ky ADANL WR EoneY FE Cysongel aw | GAA Spgs? oe Jo ad¢ fo AGREE Ye Vor TY Ts We MAA Godks abou bo Non 9 “aay \ WUBAY} OL WH G NL WW oarasroe WAT Ko Looneehi ee ee Legace a WL Lem ; Xs koh Was WAG WAAL GF he dag’ a a Sen arWanyy 0 DWT (winge AQUL VEILS [lS cho WHBW Con, hy, OSL |