No. 23-7660

Michael Steven Smith v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process federal-criminal-law federalism firearm-possession interstate-commerce standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional? i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Michael Steven Smith
Christy Posnett Martin — Federal Public Defender-Northern District of Texas, Petitioner
Christy Posnett Martin — Federal Public Defender-Northern District of Texas, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent