No. 23-7661
Muhammad E. Milhouse v. New York City Department of Homeless Services, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-representation civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure critical-stage due-process representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standing victim-rights
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Chil Qucticn WiTohn Cy. Roberts +f Mee rapist are to ge — UN punished by “the. laces protects the Vieling Whar 1'5_. the Vitin t+odo-And Can -he Kesponlertts AHocney!s — decide. Whether i ha ke. lega/ repre sembetia ry “so — Where than wre MY YZUS. cae GEZB cya Acton fe _ deprivation of rights and my l4r, amerAment being protected ? Must iand my family Continue to Like. __ in tear Everday ASE do. . |
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent City of New York to respond filed.
2024-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2024)
Attorneys
City of New York
Jennifer Lerner — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Muhammad Milhouse
Muhammad Milhouse — Petitioner