No. 23-7669
Anthony Bender, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency police-testimony prosecutorial-misconduct reasonable-sentence witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-government's-failure-to-disclose-the-dash-camera-video-constituted-a-brady-violation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the government’s failure to disclose the dash camera video constituted a Brady violation? 2 Whether a conviction based solely on the testimony of a police officer is sufficient to meet the government’s burden of proof when there was a video that seemed to contradict his testimony? 3. Whether a sentence of ninety-six (96) months is reasonable in light of the instant case’s facts? -ii in LOT OT LAO A
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Anthony Bender
Bart Edward Beals — Beals Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
Bart Edward Beals — Beals Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent