Does a State Appellate Court violate a Petitioner's right to Due Process under the United States Constitution, when a court recast a litigants pleading that was already properly casted when it was filed?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does a State Appellate Court violate a Petitioner’s right to Due Process under the United States Constitution, when a court recast a litigants pleading that was already properly casted when it was filed? Has a State Appellate Court violated or disregarded the purpose of recasting a pleading, if the Courts recasting, prejudices a litigant thereby removing the right to redress ? grievances? i Does a State Appellate Court’s recasting of a pleading without providing an opportunity : for a Petitioner to address a courts recasting deny a litigant’s right under due process and equal protection under the U.S. Constitution? Is a count in an indictment void by Federal Law or by the Ohio Supreme Courts definition outline in State v. Henderson 161 Ohio St. 3d 285 (defining void), if an : indictment was amended to change the identity of an offense or if the identity of the offense is changed without properly amending an indictment prior to trial? : Does the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution concerning Due Process and Equal Protection? when so violating a defendant’s right to an indictment, if a state requires an indictment as in the case at bar. ; 2 LISTED PARTIES [X] All parties to this proceeding are listed in the caption of this case. RELATED CASES e State v. Chamblin, Court of Common Pleas, (Trial Court Hamilton County, Ohio Case No. B0903691. Judgement entered on March 30, 2010. « State v. Chamblin, 2023-Ohio-3129, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 3095 (Ohio First Appellate District Case No. C-220488. Entered on September 6, 2023. e State v. Chamblin, 2023 Ohio LEXIS 2422 (Ohio Supreme Court Case No. 2023-1316. Entered on Dec. 12, 2023. 3