No. 23-7672

Andrew Culler v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2024-06-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause due-process medical-examination sexual-assault sixth-amendment testimonial-hearsay victim-statements
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

The admission of testimonial hearsay violates the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented for Review The admission of testimonial hearsay violates the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause. In this case, the medical/sexual assault nurse's examination constituted testimonial hearsay. This is due to the lack of medical corroboration and reliance on victim statements for conclusions. Must this Court assume jurisdiction to address this potential Sixth Amendment violation?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-01-22

Attorneys

Andrew Culler
Rhys Brendan Cartwright-JonesBRENDAN, Petitioner
Rhys Brendan Cartwright-JonesBRENDAN, Petitioner