Was trial counsel ineffective?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) | WAS TRIAL COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILURE TO MOVE FOR ; AMISTRIAL, OR FILE A SEVERANCE MOTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, WHICH PREJUDICE HIS DEFENSE? FOR FAILING TO PRESENT A COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE DEFENSE? AND FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE OR SUBPOENA A KEY DEFENSE WITNESS DESPITE HIM BEING ON THE WITNESS LIST? a.) Petitioner’s co-defendant who is also his brother wanted to use , a different defense than him and their defenses would have been completely inconsistent. And the juries would have had to decide which defendants to believe. b.) The Key witness would have corroborating testimony of self-defense ; theory. The Ginther Hearing that was held in the trial court was misleading and an abuse of discretion of opinion. See; (Affidavit). c.) Petitioner contends that, “but for trial counsel’s unreasonable ; unforeseeable failures” in the advocating process which severely . prejudice him and violated the VI, XIV, Amendment Rights of the United States Constitution. He would have had a likely chance of acquittal. . 2) DID THE PROSECUTOR COMMIT MISCONDUCT DURING CLOSING ARGUMENTS BY APPEALING TO THE JURYS SYMPATHIES FOR THE VICTIMS? a.) It has long been settled that a prosecutor may not appeal to the jury or sympathize with the victim’s. The prosecutor’s actions prejudiced the petitioner and his counsel. The trial must be rendered fundamentally unfair. i ;