No. 23-7674
Eric Wright v. Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.
Tags: batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky constitutional-law due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus jury-selection racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals' refusal to grant Mr. Wright habeas corpus relief in respect to his claim of unlawful racial discrimination in the selection of his trial jury conflict with the principles set forth by this Court in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), and its progeny?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the court of appeals’ refusal to grant Mr. Wright habeas corpus relief in respect to his claim of unlawful racial discrimination in the selection of his trial jury conflict with the principles set forth by this Court in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), and its progeny? RULE 14.1(b) STATEMENT (i) All
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-24
Waiver of Kristin Mayes, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2024-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent Kristin Mayes, et al. to respond filed.
2024-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Eric Wright
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kristin Mayes, et al.
Eliza Christine Ybarra — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Eliza Christine Ybarra — Arizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent