civil-rights-violations

questions presented are the following: 1. At what point does a disabled defendant that has committed no crime have there civil rights and ada rights violated without repercussion; under what constitutional law does this take place? . 2. In the law of “42 U.S. Code § 407 Assignment of benefits” it states in section (a) the following “The right of any person to any future payment under this subchapter shall not be transferable or assignable, at law or in equity, and none of the moneys paid or payable or rights existing under this subchapter shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process, or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.” What law holds supremacy to violate the law of “42 U.S. Code § 407 Assignment of benefits”? 3. In a case such as this of which has no monies from remuneration for employment and no child support of which in return gives the state NO subject matter jurisdiction then is there or is there not full and total protection of monies and assets that the monies pay for through the law of “42 U.S. Code § 407 Assignment of benefits”? 4. Under which constitutional law does it allow a state court to not prosecute proven crimes and criminal intent that openly violate the civil rights of a disabled person? ii . . 5. Under what civil rights law does it allow a disabled person to have the act of attempted murder to be committed against them to extort money from SSDI funds, and for the violating parties (hiring and actor) to be not prosecuted because one of them is a court employee? 6. Under which federal, constitutional, ada, or civil rights laws does it allow a court docket to be altered against a disabled person? | 7. What law supersedes the protection of undue hardship against disabled property owners such as the SSA rule and law of “SSA POMS: SI 01130.130 Real Property Whose Sale Would Cause Undue Hardship, Due to Loss of Housing, to a CoOwner”? iii