No. 23-7692
Angel Jesus Paniagua v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment commerce-clause constitutional-interpretation due-process federal-authority federal-statute firearm-regulation firearms interstate-commerce second-amendment standing
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment framework of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment framework of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. II. Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) should be construed to require a more substantial connection to interstate commerce than the mere passage of a firearm across state lines in an unspecified way, and if not, whether it exceeds Congress’s power to enact? i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Angel Jesus Paniagua
Stephanie Eileen Inman — The Law Office of Stephanie Inman, Petitioner
Stephanie Eileen Inman — The Law Office of Stephanie Inman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent