Question not identified.

No question identified. : i QUESTION (5) PRESENTED . Recause the Jw work eth wrath * Lor where Wo Igw is there is wo fransg (ession/, | ; Fransq°e Ssions! infer inge ment ot violation of Jaw of duty However there was on absidgment . Te ceduce in Scope! Diminsh ¢ atfemps fe ~~~ The fight of Free speech and the powel te have cuslody of the iNdivibual (Garcia Coleman, DOC*)8 2 4) the powref > make decisions related 6 mobility and fyavel)2 How can Garcia Colemay the individual oct issue here % wot Gacc ic Coleman himself argu ini Hat tie State ot Wisconsiv Depart enst oS Corcee roms is depriving him of substastiel due process cights or constitututonal eights lout that the State of Wisconsin, Oepactment of Corrections or State of wisconsin , Crrcuit Court, Columbia County , Cipcurt Court Judge W, And cew Voigt 15, is not , or mney be deny ing Garcia Coleman'¢ querd ian the Sub-stantial due process rights, Free Speech cight, Lt ber ty eight, Faual Pro ection eight, treatment eight, Poctient Health Care vecords , Lileerty* the limits within which a certain amount of freedom may . be enercise pelected te mobi \ity aut travels, {reece from pot in Use“take liberties fy be “bo impertinent in ackvon) or speech such as | ; There ace“no Circumstances uaket phish 22°eccee So comol etely supersedes a Dudgmont H-comviction such that the Guardian hed (wot) the authority 40 inform the Department ok (Corrections t release ‘, a wach from prison * associa ted with the quad ion! ship case 2 How can't Allie Coleman Garcia Coleman's guardians have . a absolute constitutional right tb the evercise of fhe rights granted under The guardianship anid any abcidg emewt/ a Curtailment as with imo~aitment f the evercise of those powers created by the law mak rang locaneh oF the Shete of Wisconsin legislature ascribed to be transferred Jo the Quacdian which the Stee of Wisconsin, Cireait Corck, Columbia, ounty Ciccuit Court appointed Mine Coleman Guardian of the person Garcia Coleman, QOC F/8 359] with having Jeans ferred 1 Guardian of the Pecson W power (s) specifically Da. The pouxt ip make decisions ctlated 45 mobility amd travel., and Ho, The power te have custody of the jnd~ividual (Craccia Coleman , Qo0* 1g 35°49! 0.0.2. 5/4/1920 ), Ff ans adult, prerecuisi te/ cequired before hand ot asa virect charge/ 4 load lund ew ons give aS a duty, ete. to make cesponsi ble for. The (burt Orders: | grant) confer formally do without the State oS Wisconsin) Department of Correciows objecting timely to the duceck Charge instead Chosen wot even Frmely appeal /the dteeck charge of the cireuit court ty a nig her court for review, cicther than Constilute cc consti ut tonseel abridgment of the Stake of Wisconsin, Circuit Court, Columbia County direct Charge afforded < Alline Coleman a direct charge The power t have custody of the individual 7 ovviation > From whiol Place, Goucce, oF cause ¢ Can Car cra (olen! WINNINS argument 1% 4 AM Ue te above From te appearanct. of a . thing, a Seen fom a specific points, view! perspective of the (ourt appowted guardian and rot Wmself foward the Prisoner aspect of constitudionsal litigation or the Science or philosophy ot Jaw: \urcis| prudence, of jurisdic trons He admin sf erin} of yaskeet, authority $0 , decide cases in accordant nith the 854 jo Chepttr 54 Wistonsid Stat~utes provided and this Supreme Court of The Unittd States predicotes aright fe due process as Heddwele 1 of Coty. Pull, 556 US, YY4, . 129 §.ct. 17697, which W. Andrew Voigt Columbia County Circeait lout Sado, Beavch II Euunctated wo further ation will be taken by the | Cou “Adda The United Slates Couwt of Appeals forthe Seventh Careutt on Det. 4, 9023 Ordered go no appeal tay he taken O) is jt adverse / moving of working ind aw opposite or ‘con tracy directions opposed 6 > As the law> has domiov/supteme authority, over the W. Andrew ; Voigt Circuit Court Judge which concluded no further action will be Faken boy the Coved, tse from deprived ty take Something (the pow