No. 23-770
John Doe v. Bill Crouch, in His Official Capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-challenge equal-protection federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction redressability rooker-feldman standing state-court
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Rooker-Feldman bar jurisdiction when declaring a statute unconstitutional would undermine a state court's reliance upon the statute?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does Rooker-Feldman bar jurisdiction when declaring a statute unconstitutional would undermine a state court’s reliance upon the statute? Does Rooker-Feldman preclude the federal court from deciding the constitutionality of a legislative act that the state court ratified, acquiesced in, and/or left unpunished? Is the redressability element of standing satisfied when a favorable decision would mandate equal treatment?
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-23
Waiver of right of respondent Crouch, Sec., WV DHHR, et al. to respond filed.
2024-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 16, 2024)
2023-09-14
Application (23A244) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 25, 2024.
2023-09-06
Application (23A244) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 26, 2023 to January 25, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Crouch, Sec., WV DHHR, et al.