Whether the federal courts should address the Strickland Assistance of Trial Counsel claims are moot due to the claims being stayed, whether dismissing the habeas corpus and certificate to appeal were proper, and whether the petitioner was completely denied counsel on appeal.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FoR Ree \ TS ane metids of on et GLAS apd. cee nck erolvcked Yoyo Skche Court BS geview, dhaul&’ o Fedecrs counk obderss TneSeckwe Assishonct & “Taiok Counsel claing ons ARE meetes Ao onstsa helen he chains ORE stayed Nathere dtuyina, of Aienissina a Sthe \Wolotus Corpus ond CeetiSiccke Vo Pannolete Coure eshicS of , & GS. SA Amendment claim Alnck Akt peribionte wes commpcdely Sensicd coonseh oh opptcl See dhe Seeks ? ; 2. TR we AsSemdouks Aaah counsel would wel ‘efapt o cRimimok come jinsttod ceckina glea negptichions ; , ond nck NaricSina, Ce Socielly, cMtce meaks & as Cost. : : ed HaK gina, dot ASendost , week ovdave A REDLESS would Ae AsBendoste Vane iG Stokt groceduonce lot eedtesss ond wrk Srdseck \detos cEhREs Yee Gronedetde Set a Steke . Tncteckive Aesistouce oS Teich Coussel chain Nero wed dRevlked ey Ateckivess dot de Stk Atioh caonoel grevidina, Ne odsiee nck c ed\orktrck okkocdk® wos onetladde ch Nnoh. Mune? >. Cons Gearaicrs oWicich Cade Annchoked 3 wenn awd A-WSL skotucs ‘aoe ack Ro on ineeckive emeisvomct A Selo counsel claim of cleus conpes aeckkeS Were Stee Sour WEES Lot sqQuered usithy Rulisgge in Rot vy. Hotta orktan, $24 ws, 029, WE Cr800) oasd. , Gare v. Tddke, BA $198,203 Carta), oken Soke Neck : covmsclh consid ee atSoulk ch oo Asely ogpeck and , ; Krowinay, aomdentd Wai cast 7 S$