No. 23-7706

Tia Pugh v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-obedience-act civil-rights commerce-clause congressional-authority due-process first-amendment interstate-commerce legislative-vagueness standing vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Pugh's prosecution under the Civil Obedience Act exceed Congress' authority to legislate interstate and foreign commerce?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did Pugh's prosecution under the Civil Obedience Act exceed Congress' authority to legislate interstate and foreign commerce? 2, Did Pugh's prosecution under the Civil Obedience Act violate her First Amendment Rights? 3. Is the language of the Civil Obedience so vague as to violate her Due Process Rights?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2024-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionProof of Service

Attorneys

Tia Pugh
Gordon Gray Armstrong III — Petitioner
Gordon Gray Armstrong III — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent