Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violate Petitioner's Constitutional Rights by affirming the Lower Court's order Removing Petitioner's Name from the April 23,2024 Primary Ballot?

Questions Presented . Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violate Petitioner Constitutional Rights by affirming the Lower Courts order Removing Petitioners Name from the April 23,2024 Primary Ballot. Is it in the best interest of Democracy to allow Ghost Objectors have a Candidates name removed from the ballot. Is this practice truly in the best interest of the Constitutional protectants put in place to protect the rights of Citizens to seek and hold office without barriers. Is the State law in Conflict with the ultimate protector of the Constitution the Democratic process which gives ultimate power to the voter on election day to decide which Candidates they wish to represent them in various elected offices. Did the Pennsylvania Appellate Court err in affirming the lower courts striking signatures based on them allegedly being in the hand of another despite having no HAND WRITER EXPERT TESTIMONY PROVING the writing was actually in the hand of another. Did objectors meet their burden of proof needed to violate Petitioners Constitutional Rights and defame Petitioners name tarnishing his Reputation and ability to do business. Has the lower Court again overstepped its authority in denying Petitioners Direct appeal and Constitutional due process | rights protected by law when changing all filing times including lessening times ; to file appeals. Will this Honorable Court Continue its righteous path of correcting the errs of liberal States who continue to erode our Democracy by Disenfranchising Voters by not properly updating Voting rolls and passing laws that allow ghost objectors to Circumvent the will of the Voter while claiming to secure the Vote. Does this practice encourage more participation in our Democracy or Less? If you believe less you must overturn the lower Court. i : —_—_ y 7 ll.