No. 23-7722
Christopher Harry West v. Brian Emig, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation carter-v-illinois constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process harrington-v-richter post-conviction post-conviction-review second-challenges state-law-procedural-requirement suppression-requirement
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
due-process-violation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . a Where a State Court post-conviction Teview Was denied _ without « Key State-law proceedoral requirement and +he Statute Mas immediadly changed with no notice barring second challenges — fr all defendants forgoing trial, is due process violated along with | the holding of Carter Vtilnois , 329 v-s. 173 (1946) and Hatrington —v.Rickiter, 562 uss, 86 (201) 7 oe :
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent Brian Emig, Warden to respond filed.
2024-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Brian Emig, Warden
Andrew J. Vella — Delaware Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Andrew J. Vella — Delaware Attorney General's Office, Respondent