Should a change of venue be granted in a civil rights case against a county prosecutor and county employees?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © Should a hande OF Vee! be genoied ie whe cent hug prion Nilory /relhan Ship worth the Trial Toye? nme ‘oernd \ end we ne SAIC dod ste fosker 4 ahio | sin orer rhage vTth teat fodye when Trival (eaters Arornel Br Gon | defendant was die: sting Counhy prose 1 Vay, Ana Me gS lrvosutt. A contentions ww SO, public rid Noterid “Adeurst deSenchant. Roost or dlegeesiow em clear MP . : Da dard Sheold nota Cheinle OF \anve, be qandled dee hr notoriees , vuzll Enewro Civil rq sot CQ) 4AVL. aqninst the, Commty , County ProsewtOr, county proseuutors oF Fue ars CL monicpalty Whey ye. above AU" to nclyde several jodicinl oF cas AS vortness a the. geFensé, +l County employes. Should he Courly pioseuotor ¢ oie being Chenaed wea cwil rights Sot the enly Second oF Hs kein WH Heus Fersey be rrllewredl to (prosecute deFendert Gil the while exlnibrng oHethiaal pracctrees AS A means of retnlition For being Sued or Shall A Chane ee Venve be constrtshendlly appropri c ether ko maurtnttl the APEEMIME oF Frimes