Whether a petitioner should be denied an evidentiary hearing to question a juror who failed to disclose information

ESTION PRESENTED = eee Rouen ; 1. WHETHER A PETITIONER SHOULD BE DENIED AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO QUESTION A JUROR WHO FAILED TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION BECAUSE STATE COURTS RULED PETITIONER RECEIVED A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JURY DESPITE SAID JUROR NEVER BEING QUESTIONED? ANSWER NO RELIEF SoustT! FIRST EULDERTIAGY HEAT ll. WHETHER A PETITIONER IS DENIED SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH ; CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JURY WHEN A JUROR FAILS TO ANSWER HONESTLY A MATERIAL QUESTION DURING VOIR DIRE? | AWIWERS YES RELTET SousttT s NELOTREAL BY SuURY lil. WHETHER A PETITIONER IS DENIED SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INFORM TRIAL COURT A JUROR WHO KNEW . PETITIONER PERSONALLY RESULTED IN SAID JUROR BEING REMAINING JUROR? | ANSWER VES QELTEE SovenT ? NELOTICEAL BY Sogy Ne ANRETHERL PROCEDURE BARS SWOLLD PREVENT PENTIONERS Rot’) WANING HIS OR WER CLENR STROCTUAL TRIM ERRORS FRow\ BETIS ADDRESSED? AWWER NO" RELTEF SovettT: DIRECT ke . VANENED. PURSUNST To 98 U.S.C. 105) WE ——ONTTED. STNTES SUPREMNE COURT SHOOL) BE ALLOWED TO Proms, REUTEY FoR CLASES ER Come ASSTOS GROCIONL TRXNL ERRORS UNDER TE ALL vous NANCY? : ASWELL. VES RELIEF SovGhT: CopuTctan 5 OURCTUGED