Whether the petitioner is responsible for the deaths of the victims, given the testimony of the forensic psychologist that the petitioner was drugged and unaware of his actions at the time of the incident

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . His NEIGHBOR, THE ) PEerivioNER pips DROGGED AT A PaetY BY Commvet . bfie Yo PEt TleNER WAS NOT CONSCIOUS OR AwRRE OF His oe, 4" 2 CTE ‘ jo NiHES THe NEIGHBOR, ANDRES LI<EA, pi Beete fen F Uper e PETITIONER ANO® STATED, “YOU Have ate THosé Guns’ Bere Pe ewes l E. EGACL Shot Ame Kieced THE Vierims. 15 HE, THE PENTIONER, TeE . RESPONS Bee Faery fon THELE OEATHS? 2 Soup MAT THEN FABIAN, FoRENSiC 5 tcte LOG 97, WAS ttiged To 4 , EvALOATE THE PETITIONER fan AN NG RE BeTr Was WNeovr . " *) CALLE® To TARE THe STAND Ae TRAC. Hes TESTIMOBSY AND an MATE CPLON 2 THAT TAC PEC, Ton ge WAS SLiPEZD A og -s . i 4 O6, WAS Forcy Cf bratinecy INTO NCATE? AD No TEsTi mony Wit E*D To THe ACaxtrar of THE Viv NenE@, Hig TESTIMONY Was YNANALOABLE pz TRAC bve re A cc EA ER 2oe., HE WAS HIZED Te TEST EY Ar FENTENOING AS AW. TGA (pen Wenn wii CATING QIN Ess TAS 4h CAR FDete NC ewEg. Tete. ‘TH ONE BEnE vy . THIS spy " Cex tery, THELE Wits No PENTENLING. 15 ; ) EFF eer ie Aes \sTaseet oF COUNS Ez 7 3) REPEAL COUNSEL ¢ As ¢ coe A MCE® Te use SOM FRBIAN'S TET men Leon ay of N Ans J Ews TEiac. He Was AwAage CF THe EVA LO ATION 0 Cleese Nex 1 DoE New EViOEN CE A¢ WISHES, pers THIS) CAIN ST p46 CHEK Ts * NEGLEcT COM Ss Titers INE EE g: A) Tee Tine Cov gr DEN zd PE ri monEee Ans EVLDEN TiAgY HEARING FoR SOHN FABLAN TO TESTIEY ON THE Ee), Ts THis DEN Ac OF A HEAEING Sueciae AbuC oF Didsceerian 2 : & tte COURT, THE STATE of TEXAS AND THE cover APPOINTED ATTORNES fop THE Per TONER FREVEN TED Jonny FAGAN 5 EXCL PATE KY EVIBENER Feo MAKIN tHE LEC2RO, heks : THIS BENG oof DLE PLocess CONSTITOTE AN CEVE RS BE ELC? Pars THIS TYPE SF Coleusiont CONST (Tote A MmLSCARRIAGE OF Justice? WS Conse Amenns 5, 6, Anto iW. Question (8) PRESENTED Leni TIinveo 6) THE STATE bee per Tr oneR's REQvuEst For NEW TRine Bacvem 6m THe Excl PavTory EViPENCE (NN Joun” FABLAN'S | TESTIMONY (Fouts pe TEST Mand), BECAUSE Peri THNER'S Cover ABP POIN TED ATTORNEY FAILEO T@ Os— New EVI BENCE ing Hlo MeTUAN Foe Kew TRIAC. 15 THIS Aw £RCOR, ANDO Ts THIS A viecaTIoN YF DUE PReocessé Dw THE Dover OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TExaS — -FReoR BY Not peters arr ORDEZING A NEW TRIHC ons THE EXCOLPATORY EVI DENCE (N TERISTEN \ heard SRE savy pfrto, fOESEE TESTIMenty 2 Is i B) did THE Covet pF ARE RIM IN AL APPEALS OF ‘TEKAS ‘ EREOL OY Not OVECTUENING PEN TION EK's | CONVicTIAN BAaSEO ON DTNEFFECTINE ASSISTANCE | OF COUNSEL FAIRE TO INVESTIC ATE INVOLUNTR RY IN TOxLcations % A CAN AND WEL THe Soeeeme CovugtT Heew AN Ev pent 6 (ARN HERRING we Sonn Marritew FABLAN To TESTIFY? ) foe CARY teERtH TD TESTIF{? For TRISTEN Hearty Ta TEST Wl? 110) Basco on THE TESTE MON, Wike THE SurZEmE Cover VACATE ' tHe fet Ten ce's DNV ic Tiny 2 Ye PTATE OF TEXAS 15 Loe THHOC DING Bodl CAMERA BoTAGE : Paovine Bornean Neer fie Ovwtn OTICKELS HAS LEFUSED To: : fETi TUN Fe. 15 THis ries ag Cates erase re + VIOLATWN OR 15 THS A NEW TYRE ge Viob mtn COT eT fom CAMERA TOTAGE Wite sius Police MisconOuct PLANTED ONA, Qveéestions PRESENTED Cons TIATVED —~ 7 I2) A BLACK MAGAZINE FOR AN ARs RELE WAS IN THE GUN.s4FE AT HE PETITIONER'S Home, AT The Time OF THE INclog ye ( iN Que sTion. Zr Hao PET) Teneg's ®NA, Ano WAS ClLhmey By PRoSfcoTORS To BE founso AT The se NE E. OF THE (Noto T Beds EXS7 ¢ CAME £A feoT AGE Wize SHouy / MAS Not FES O THAT THE MAG AZ INE AT THE SéENE, THE FosTAG BEING wWi-ry HELO Feo, 9 , € ls ANO BY reac Covnl Ae ONE bY THE OTATE ) 7 PEL. 15 THis 4 ViOLATION oF OE feoLcess : Asa 15 THIS INEFFECTIVE APS°STANCE ON Teac COUNSEL FoR Not CHALLENGING QNA fvrwence t (3) Pet iTiessee fosed pis GRouUN® AS INEFFECTIVE Assis. TANCE OF CounseL, FAILURE 7 INNEST (GATE INVoLyyTARY iN TOK LAT ON THOUGH | 'T COULD HAVE BEEN, HANE BEEN fosen +e INNESTIGATE ANY PRESENT / UTILIZE 5 WeHelLaGicAL / PSICHIATRie IN BRMATon AT Teac, WEEOEN V. Jounsany 54 £.3a (063 CG+tk Cp 2017). 1 WEEDEN'S Case USAS OVEETULENED Be THis FRR0G . 040 THE STATE OF TEXAS ERO0R BY AloT ovegTURNING PETITIONERS CASE? WET 1s A VicLaTION oF QUE PRoeE