No. 23-7744
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection jurisdiction mcgirt-ruling native-american native-american-rights reservation-law retroactivity tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; ON May 7h 2oay Jis Vers Set Feed after fecievinal Merck “ts the Toling Was Made bu Ronald eevee Eastern Districhy of oklahoma, the Same Coucts that sent the eet Honey back to the illegal Sentence WIth False Claims that the McGict v. oklahoma u.s. 54 2020 Ruling Was rot Tetroactive for Him but has “deemed Yelroactive For everyone else Why 15 the Oetiti omer being treated differant > and bein drsaciminated against He iS a Qitizen | eacolled Member OF the Muscoage Qceek Kotion tribe axa the alleged Crime “oF Domestic Violence pecurred on the Muscogee Creek Resesvation in His (reek Indian Home See Orges Hand §
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-29
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.