No. 23-7749
Carlos Enrique Lopez-Soto v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure court-of-appeals dismissal due-process government-objection judicial-procedure notice notice-of-judgment standing timeliness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals could dismiss an action based on untimely notice where (1) the district court's judgment was never notified, and (2) in the absence of a timely objection from the government
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals could dismiss an action based on untimely notice where (1) the district court's judgment was never notified, and (2) in the absence of a timely objection from the government. i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-06-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent