civil-procedure

No question identified. : Question’s Presented (1) Did the Eighth Circuit abuse it’s discretion in failing to recall the mandate of the panel decision affirming the district court without a final decision on appellant document 42 motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 (b) to vacate judgement for which document 41 motion for recusal pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C 455 depended on in violation of Title 28 U.S.C 1291 district court final decision jurisdictional requirement to consider the jurisdictional question. (2) Did the Eighth Circuit abuse it’s discretion in failing to recall the mandate based on the irrefutable evidence of the district court judicial bias misconduct which deprived appellant of a meaningful opportunity to be heard in the district court by an impartial decision maker and a meaningful opportunity to appellate review of my Federal Rule of civil procedure rule 60 (b) motion to vacate judgment which set forth new facts and Supreme Court case law that refuted the district court bases for denial. (3) Did the Eighth circuit abuse it’s discretion in failing to recall the mandate where the eighth Circuit Clerk docket showed the district court continued the judicial bias misconduct attempting to have my appeal dismissed as untimely by submitting false dated text order judgements in violation of Federal Rules of Appellate procedure 10. (a)(1) and (a)(3) Record on Appeal provision to try and cover up the judicial bias misconduct by preventing appellate review.