No. 23-7759

Israel Santiago-Lugo v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-discretion judicial-review legal-reasoning procedural-error reasoned-decision-making supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

May the District Court and Court of Appeals ignore the Supreme Court's decision in Concepcion v. U.S.

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Petitioner application for a Writ of Certiorari presented different questions§ (1) May the District Court and Court of Appeals ignore the Supreme Court's decision in Concepcion v. U.S., 142" ; S.Ct 2389, 213 L.Ed.2d 731 (2022) ? (2) May the District Court and Court of Appeals ignore that the orders and Judgment do not explained thier decisions and failed to give a brief statement of reasons to demonstrate that they considered the Petitioner's nonfrivolous arguments according the Supreme Court's decision in Concepcion v. U.S., 142 S.Ct 2389, 213 L.Ed.2a 731 (2022) ? (3) Whether both federal Courts failed to perform with Concepcion v. U.S., 142 S.Ct 2389, 213 L.Ed.2d 731 (2022), the district court abused its discretion ? -i : III.

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. See 28 U. S. C. §455(b)(3) and Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, Canon 3B(2)(e) (prior government employment).
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-25
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-06-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2024)

Attorneys

Israel Santiago-Lugo
Israel Santiago-Lugo — Petitioner
Israel Santiago-Lugo — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent