Whether the exclusion of evidence related to Luckett's brother's detention inside the crime scene perimeter violated Luckett's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to present a complete defense,

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circo mis apphad this Coort's Precedents. _ -An_tuling thet Retvtioner was net denied right to presenta -| -—Complete. defense by the_exclusion_of 1 idence ,B rady vy. Maryland 213,55 & Whether the exclusion Was ademal of Sixth mo, on —Amendment_tight 4o trial by Jura by lighten the prosecct ions. burden of proofs’ Does exclusion of Svidence and Witness Nislote the Consritubonal. right to V mi VII J XW. Amendments & a a F . _ JABLE OF CONTENTS Pa Isgue_Presen}ed a llable of Authorities i Re. tion for a Wrt of Dertierarp dude ment below | uriadiohon \ Gtstahen.al and Stabstory PrmsionsInvsiued 2° ue. foam Reasons far Granting-the Web 1B Conclus to iq treo of service 18 | Ir _ |SSUE RESENTED FOR REVIEW Lucketts brother, whe hada history of Commithing abberies of Dakland businesses, Ws 5 detained Within Minufes Lnside Police : Perimeter, Which the trial Court did nof (allow) the durade learns Did the trial Courts exclusion of allewidence elated oo Luckett's brother’s detention inside rime Scene perimeter violate Lucket's DSicth and bourteenth ae noe * ra) present a Complete defense al _ ourts precedente, in tuling that, the state Gourt's decision las, yot Contra cy te, or An _lUnreas onable reeiceter . clearly ——_—_—— eatablished 1) ted \ Svor Oe it Pradtocd u Paramol D4) US. Apo 18829 ‘6 [eople Vi Earp 2 Cal 47» 8%, B8 1 rn Na Ls tell 935 Fal (03, (24 8 napman Si: Calitorns (We) 386 US: \8 . {0 US.v Bagley (426) 473 US 667,676 1314 Noprendtat Ne nd a US, 466 13 |. taylor v Ifiinoig (1908) 464 US. 400, 407-404 , 416 _ ; ioN FORA WRIT QE RTINRAR | |, Charles dward Luckett Petitions tats Courtfor a writ of Certiorari: to Celiey) the. Agipent of He United. Stakes. Cooke ee Memo dum Ted Mar \5 2024, This disposition 1s not Appropriate for publicatianand ir e 36-5. _ SURISDICTION dament, the date on hich the United States curt of Apseals decided my Case was Mar |s, 2024 Fehtioner appeals fromthe denial of his uirit of habeas oreus, which par Red pursuant to 2B US.C,3 2254, Pre habit Counted drasdichon Under £8 U8... ££ 224 la and 225418). On Nov, 22, 20204he distrret overt denied “H 2 petition ond declinedte Issve A Cerbfical ofp pealabality,Febhane taney $$ appealed and the Ninth Civcot Granted aceriPicabe of appeatabal ty on March 31, 2022 MheNinth Pyroo ee D aun dun Sdiction under 2BUS,C-S8 124 and 2253, 4 tsdi o iS Court ts_Invoked Undey ee BUS. 8 1254(, USCS. { __ Cs Q onal and stiito cu Provisions Involved » U.S, Lonstebat »0, Amendment \\\ . Inall criminal Prosecutions, the accused Shall enjoy the right -to tral by on impartial Jura neo tobe confronted with the witnesses dganst him ,de have . compvisary precess Yor obtain ing udiness es __ In We ‘avo rand to have the assistance of Covnsel for ( defen € y UA: on on, Amendment V. | _INo Person+’+ Shall be deprived of \ife,Iberty, —_ UNhouvt due process of lowe 8, D stration, Amendment Nt Vial b dury += the right of teral by dung __ Shall be Preserved, )&. Conetrtution, Amendment X\V | | A » State Shall make or enforce Any law which shall Abridge he Oriuileqes «+ af Citizens of the United \ aes, Nor shall Buy state deprive ‘any Person of hfe ltherty, or property wiroot due process of Loud, __ pr _denute anu persor ust \otisdietio® | is) | \itle-28t,S.C.8 2254 Q) _ the Supreme, (aorta dustice ereof, a Circutt Judge ora district Court shallentertain an | Application tor a writ of habeas Corpus in pehalt of a persea Custed y pursvant Le the Huda ment O+ 2 ¥ on Aroun Hy ot he. ie UStod Viola: ere cark = e Unted States! |} BUS.C,8 22 54 “hh application tor a wert of habeas Corpus a hehalf of a person in Custodu Oursvant +a the Nudgment of a Grate Court shat! rot be aranted _ m Yespect da a jaim_ tha as ‘ad aCAaATed On the merits in State Coork proceedino unless + e AA udicatlon © @ ClaiwW resulted 1 adecisinn thatulas Contrary +o, or Involved an Unreasonable application of Clear | established Padoral aw 85 deter mined | Khe \upre 2 Coot of