Christopher L. Parker v. Darren Galloway, Warden
Whether the petitioner was denied due process by not being allowed to submit supplemental evidentiary arguments or be allowed to submit an amended memorandum of law?
No question identified. : adésrirans PHESELTED FOR RE EE ue £2 was dented Ove Process bY NOF betng e/lowed FO Submuk suPPlementol txhourtian arguments or be olloudd +o Sobmrt On Ainendéed Memorander of sau? ; QUESTZTOA Thaw Cirtemstantes eKtst that render Stote Court Remed ses in effeet(ve #0 Protect my wstA FRrahks Parswant to £euse 2254 HOG CY? QUEST ZOU THREE 702205 613-63 0) QOD, AY, ADIAOIAD when CPAred together underthe *n Part merterra AOOSII RE tetiehl deny Ebial Protection tthe low in vrotasion oF the 1(4¢hA isl 4?