Did the District Court shift the burden of proof from the United States to the defendant in violation of 18 U.S.C. 3583(e)(3) and was defendant's right to due process violated pursuant to the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The questions presented are: 1. Did the District Court shift the burden of proof from the United States to the defendant in violation of 18 U.S.C. 3583(€)(3) {see In Re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)} in a supervised release revocation hearing, and was defendant’s right to due process violated pursuant to the 5 Amendment to the United States Constitution pursuant to Rule 32.1(b)(2)(C), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure {see Morrisey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972) and Gagnon v Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 788 (1973)}. 2 United States v. Edward Treisback, Petition for Certiorari No. INTERESTED PARTIES and RELATED CASES There are no