Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(¢)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Willis, in light of New York State Rifle ¢> Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 §. Ct. 2111 (2022). 2. Whether, as a statutory matter, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) prohibits a person’s present intrastate possession of a firearm or ammunition for the sole reason that the firearm or ammunition previously crossed state lines. 3. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of a firearm or ammunition solely because they crossed state lines at some point before they came into the defendant’s possession. i
Docket Entries
2024-11-08
Judgment Issued.
2024-10-07
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-22
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2024)
2024-05-23
Application (23A1037) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until June 28, 2024.
2024-05-17
Application (23A1037) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 29, 2024 to June 28, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Joshua Willis
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Leah D. Yaffe — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent