Nalerton Charles v. United States
Arbitration DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether the time has come for this Court to exercise supervision over the ever-expanding prosecutorial practice of requiring defendants to give up their right to appeal, as the price of a negotiated plea, while the government retains its own access to judicial review; and whether this practice is violative of defendants' due process rights, against public policy, contrary to congressional intent, and inconsistently applied
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the time has come for this Court to exercise supervision over the everexpanding prosecutorial practice of requiring defendants to give up their right to appeal, as the price of a negotiated plea, while the government retains its own access to judicial review; and whether this practice is violative of defendants’ due process rights, against public policy, contrary to congressional intent, and inconsistently applied. PARTIES BELOW The only parties in the court below were petitioner, Nalerton Charles, and the United States of America, as represented by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.