Wrongful-conviction

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) BAS THE PETITIONER BEEN WRONGFULLY CONVICTED, DUE TO STRUCTURAL ERROR'S AT TRIAL, WHICH VIOLATED EVERY UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT HE HAD AS A DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL? a SUGGESTIVE ANSWER: YES : ; 2) DID PCRA COURT WELLFULLY IGNORE MERITORIOUS CLAIMS OF INEFFECTIVENESS OF TRIAL AND. DIRECT COUNSEL'S IN RULING CONTRARY AND UNREASONABLE BY MIS~APPLICATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION 6TH AMENDMENT IN STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON? SUGGESTIVE ANSWER: YES 3) DED PENNSYLVANIA APPELLATE COURT'S, INCLUDING THE 38D CIRCUIT COURT, WILLFULLY MIS-APPLY PRECEDENT CASELAW AND AFFIRM STRUCTURAL ERROR'S AND DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS OF TRIAL COURT? SUGGESTIVE ANSWER: YES 4) DID PCRA COURT, STATE APPELLATE AND DISTRICT COURT'S ERROR IN REFUSING TO REVIEW, HEAR OR OTHERWISE SWORN/NOTARIZED, VERIFIABLE AFFIDAVIT'S FROM KNOW ALIBI WITNESSES AS WELL AS FROM THE CONVICTED: ELLIS ELLIOT RAMOS, THE TRUE CONFESSED PERPETRATOR, IGNORING PETITIONERS CLAIM OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE? . SUGGESTIVE ANSWER: YES 7 5) HAS PETITIONER BEEN DENIED FOR MORE THAN TWO DECADES A FAIR IMPARTIAL TRIAL AND APPELLATE REVIEW OF THIS MATTER? — SUGGESTIVE ANSWER: YES a 2 oo