Whether the sentencing court had discretion to correct or perpetuate constitutional errors in the defendant's sentence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ». Goheler CTONCQUIS USE & statares casitctes SET _ katte -\uasciose| error ead other. . . Constit onc eros Under the WSrstkep Ser War TRIES she lesser ONense 341 (b) peretly cppled \n Ses Step KET sestences . 2), Ldhether a SENTRA Coget \was Ascretion -b Ceery ; . Jorwerd or Perpeliate Constrlikore| eaors o& the : ; onc SENTENCE, Pesca Sr step AST SERACING,. 4), heres a SENTENN ComT \hes Ascre\ one Ue a revised Cosa) Tepart~ wrikoor abyechen \y athe @). habe @ SeATENCING COURT RT ASIN discreMon . cade the Sar che SET Sec . ACA () 13 hen resuired Yo apply sechons 40\ 408,403 Fe eppicoble %. Shather Apprendi cad Aleyne are apicable \n . . wi uo