Did the Supreme Court of Florida invalidate the law itself when it did not assume mandatory jurisdiction?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED DID THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, BY DECLINING JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE: 1. INVALIDATE THE LAW ITSELF WHEN IT DID NOT ASSUME MANDATORY JURISDICTION, AS MANDATED BY THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, AND FLORIDA STATUTES ON APPELLATE PROCEDURE? . 2. CONDONE THE INVALIDATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE BY THE 4TH DCA, WHICH DISMISSED MY APPEAL ON A MOTION TO DISMISS, WHICH IN EFFECT MAKES OUR APPELLATE PROCESS NULL AND VOID? 38. CONDONE THE 4TH DCA NOT ASKING THE APPELLEES FOR AN ANSWER BRIEF PRIOR TO DISMISSING MY APPEAL, WHICH IN EFFECT AIDED AND ABETTED FRAUD IN THIS CASE, AS OUTLINED IN MY INITIAL BRIEF TO THE 4TH DCA?