Whether the Administrative Law Judge made correct judgments regarding the compensability of the claimant's injuries, the award of TTD benefits, and the reliability of the claimant's testimony and medical evidence

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. The Appellate inquires whether the Administrative law Judge made correct judgment that the claimant did not sustain compensable injuries to his head, neck, back, and legs in the scope of his employment with the Employer. 2. The Appellate inquires whether the Administrative law Judge made correct judgment in failing to commence TTD benefits for the period of time that the claimant was unable to work, or alternatively, for a closed period of benefits from the day of the injury. 3. The Appellate inquires whether the Administrative law Judge made correct judgment in finding claimant’s testimony unreliable based on preponderance of the evidence presented. 4. The Appellate inquires whether the Administrative law Judge made correct judgment in adopting the opinions of the Employer/Insurer IME doctors, whose opinions are not as credible as those provided by other medical treatment providers. 5. The Appellate contends whether the findings of fact made by the Administrative Law Judge supports the award denying compensability of this claim and the request for TTD benefits. 6. The appellate inquires whether the findings made by the Administrative Law Judge addresses certain evidence that shows that the claimant suffered a compensable injury. 7. The Appellate requests that the award of the Administrative Law Judge dated December 20, 2021 be reversed. 8. Appellate inquires whether the Superior Law Judge made correct judgment in law when ruling that Appellate’s case was filed beyond the 20-day period. The Superior law judge — failed to include the date that the Claimant’s appeal was clearly filed (June 7, 2022) in the State Workers Compensation Court. The Judge’s misinterpretation of Law may have caused major confuston within the courts. 9. The Appellate inquires whether the Appeal court made correct judgment when stating that Claimant wrongfully filed a Discretionary appeal, and needed to file an appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court from a Georgia Court of Appeals decision. 4