No. 23-7804
Juan Jesus Vargas v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3553 circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court-procedure judicial-discretion open-court-statement reasonableness-review sentencing sentencing-requirements statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess Punishment
SecondAmendment DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must district courts comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to state, in open court, the reasons for the sentence imposed?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Must district courts comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c) to state, in open court, the reasons for the sentence imposed? 2) Should a circuit split regarding the application of § 3553(c) to reasonableness challenges of defendants’ sentences be resolved? 3) Should conflicting application by various federal courts from across the country of U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) be resolved? 2
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-02
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2024)
Attorneys
Juan Jesus Vargas
Chad Phillip Van Cleave — Van Cleave Law Firm, PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent