No. 23-7807

Marcus Anthony Barnes v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-procedure,due-process,criminal-trial,federal court-of-appeals criminal-trial factual-evidence fifth-amendment rule-60b
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether descriptions or summary of evidence is sufficiently accurate enough to determine a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) motion alleging mistakes of factual evidence from a criminal trial record rather than reasonable inferences or direct evidence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether descriptions or summary of evidence, is sufficiently accurate enough to determine a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) motion alleging mistakes of factual evidence from a criminal trial record rather than reasonable inferences or direct evidence? 2. Whether the Court of Appeals violated Petitioner Fifth Amendment when it denied Petitioner’s C.O.A ii

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-02
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Marcus Anthony Barnes
Marcus Anthony Barnes — Petitioner
Marcus Anthony Barnes — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent